Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-27 14:09:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 10264BC7A2AA0859DD62EDF072A0A4B9B3B04ABA6A18F654D814A674865A08B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The NYT article mentions several times that the EPA overstepped its reach in this case. This was unanimous. “On Thursday, all nine justices agreed that the agency had gone too far in seeking to regulate the Sacketts’ property.“ Also, the case was not about a big polluter. https://t.co/1ND7Jie8q2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662318226100097024
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 10264BC7A2AA0859DD62EDF072A0A4B9B3B04ABA6A18F654D814A674865A08B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1685196545473
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166231822610009702410264BC7A2AA0859DD62EDF072A0A4B9B3B04ABA6A18F654D814A674865A08B1