Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-28 17:22:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0DF8E53EA66FD25EBF8AFA180BE3D87891D0FAE1E31182C14E56B875F37E8B9C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The NYT article mentions several times that the EPA overstepped its reach in this case. This was unanimous. “On Thursday, all nine justices agreed that the agency had gone too far in seeking to regulate the Sacketts’ property.“ Also, the case was not about a big polluter. https://t.co/1ND7Jie8q2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662318226100097024
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0DF8E53EA66FD25EBF8AFA180BE3D87891D0FAE1E31182C14E56B875F37E8B9C
  • createdAtMillis - 1685294560516
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16623182261000970240DF8E53EA66FD25EBF8AFA180BE3D87891D0FAE1E31182C14E56B875F37E8B9C