Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-05-27 11:28:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6DD62212B01DF312B800E4630181D7FD90E29515B84D8D6EAC4F74D51B3B8ACF
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court agreed unanimously that CWA did not apply to Sackett property, but split 5-4 on the opinion. The majority opinion reversed five decades of EPA rule making and limited the scope of the CWA's authority to regulate waters of the US, which 4 judges disapproved. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency_(2023) https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-454_4g15.pdf
All Note Details