Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-26 22:31:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D6BCF3EC5BD185718B3B9C72EDCB03A3CA0446941D34D4B83E574C2E6F6370E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Sackett v EPA decision was 9-0, so expanding the Supreme Court would likely have had no effect on this case. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-454_4g15.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662196952799522816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1D6BCF3EC5BD185718B3B9C72EDCB03A3CA0446941D34D4B83E574C2E6F6370E
  • createdAtMillis - 1685140269718
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16621969527995228161D6BCF3EC5BD185718B3B9C72EDCB03A3CA0446941D34D4B83E574C2E6F6370E