Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-28 06:34:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D1E9ECF454FA27CE58AA1D90E7BD38BE1D7C940D78EE38E504DB33A9922D667C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The decision was 9-0 with respects to the outcome of this specific case, but not the rationale behind it. The tweet is referring to that 5-4 split. The note is misleading and not necessary.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662192801512038400
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D1E9ECF454FA27CE58AA1D90E7BD38BE1D7C940D78EE38E504DB33A9922D667C
  • createdAtMillis - 1685255691137
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662192801512038400D1E9ECF454FA27CE58AA1D90E7BD38BE1D7C940D78EE38E504DB33A9922D667C