Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-27 04:02:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C94F540E5D7AAFEB17596398064C19519A0A9554B918E14810BD9CCEBB519193
Participant Details

Original Note:

The decision was 9-0 with respects to the outcome of this specific case, but not the rationale behind it. The tweet is referring to that 5-4 split. The note is misleading and not necessary.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662192801512038400
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C94F540E5D7AAFEB17596398064C19519A0A9554B918E14810BD9CCEBB519193
  • createdAtMillis - 1685160177171
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662192801512038400C94F540E5D7AAFEB17596398064C19519A0A9554B918E14810BD9CCEBB519193