Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-27 01:59:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A429DA64F09B1AA46E9A06F04162B625DE9AF0F7D96B6AD2CB8EAE6F6B8F1B08
Participant Details

Original Note:

The decision was 9-0 with respects to the outcome of this specific case, but not the rationale behind it. The tweet is referring to that 5-4 split. The note is misleading and not necessary.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662192801512038400
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A429DA64F09B1AA46E9A06F04162B625DE9AF0F7D96B6AD2CB8EAE6F6B8F1B08
  • createdAtMillis - 1685152760153
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662192801512038400A429DA64F09B1AA46E9A06F04162B625DE9AF0F7D96B6AD2CB8EAE6F6B8F1B08