Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-27 02:09:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 76F6F4DE0F6DFD7AD9094646D10700A24AF1D0B182802698954A493ED8E35AA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The decision was 9-0 with respects to the outcome of this specific case, but not the rationale behind it. The tweet is referring to that 5-4 split. The note is misleading and not necessary.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662192801512038400
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 76F6F4DE0F6DFD7AD9094646D10700A24AF1D0B182802698954A493ED8E35AA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1685153389469
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166219280151203840076F6F4DE0F6DFD7AD9094646D10700A24AF1D0B182802698954A493ED8E35AA3