Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-27 12:46:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC56DD8C5C08B0DA4F272610E70434C0757022E3069FF904C6ABE6B64E5F9B59
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is absolutely false. Since gender is social and not biological, it's impossible to know if, in those ages, fishing hooks were masculine or feminine goods. Same for "non-binary" people. That's social, not biological, because is "a feeling" with no real evidence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662124812746063874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC56DD8C5C08B0DA4F272610E70434C0757022E3069FF904C6ABE6B64E5F9B59
  • createdAtMillis - 1685191603499
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1662124812746063874EC56DD8C5C08B0DA4F272610E70434C0757022E3069FF904C6ABE6B64E5F9B59