Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-28 16:15:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A2E9CD9DF5F669C7BEC40F1171386BFC9FA2174602E72DC75C03A4C8F6257884
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is absolutely false. Since gender is social and not biological, it's impossible to know if, in those ages, fishing hooks were masculine or feminine goods. Same for "non-binary" people. That's social, not biological, because is "a feeling" with no real evidence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662124812746063874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A2E9CD9DF5F669C7BEC40F1171386BFC9FA2174602E72DC75C03A4C8F6257884
  • createdAtMillis - 1685290515769
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662124812746063874A2E9CD9DF5F669C7BEC40F1171386BFC9FA2174602E72DC75C03A4C8F6257884