Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-26 18:17:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7D7A42961954B0D547E31D7E923A675E1307ADE1F29B51C7BD76BE93FD237799
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence SARS-CoV-2 is a biological weapon. Phylogenetic analysis of full-length genome sequences obtained from infected patients showed that SARS-CoV-2 is similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and not man made. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10096-020-03899-4#Sec2 https://pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2211107119

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661925798738010112
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7D7A42961954B0D547E31D7E923A675E1307ADE1F29B51C7BD76BE93FD237799
  • createdAtMillis - 1685125048175
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16619257987380101127D7A42961954B0D547E31D7E923A675E1307ADE1F29B51C7BD76BE93FD237799