Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-27 11:14:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7AFAECF5C3B10B186333D076C2235F7D730CD8129ACF081BB04CC26F31D0E145
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court ruled 9-0 for an Idaho couple, but was divided 5-4 on EPA regulatory authority with the minority arguing that the majority had gone too far with its reasoning. The tweet is factually correct and needs no additional context. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-cuts-epas-clean-water-act-protection/story?id=99600775 https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/supreme-court-strips-federal-protections-from-some-wetlands-boosts-property-rights

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661838199537147907
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7AFAECF5C3B10B186333D076C2235F7D730CD8129ACF081BB04CC26F31D0E145
  • createdAtMillis - 1685186070608
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16618381995371479077AFAECF5C3B10B186333D076C2235F7D730CD8129ACF081BB04CC26F31D0E145