Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-05-26 12:28:03 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4F8E84EFEFC6F8EB9465BAC6361E7150C5CDC0FA78C13F2CA5D9C171B72DA84E
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court ruled 9-0 for an Idaho couple, but was divided 5-4 on EPA regulatory authority with the minority arguing that the majority had gone too far with its reasoning. The tweet is factually correct and needs no additional context. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-cuts-epas-clean-water-act-protection/story?id=99600775 https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/supreme-court-strips-federal-protections-from-some-wetlands-boosts-property-rights
All Note Details