Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-05-25 23:26:08 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: ED02301DDA79DBD33F461A6044922C5627562F7E178F44000A27684833F5564E
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court ruled 9-0 for an Idaho couple, but was divided 5-4 on EPA regulatory authority with the minority arguing that the majority had gone too far with its reasoning. The tweet is factually correct and needs no additional context. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-cuts-epas-clean-water-act-protection/story?id=99600775 https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/supreme-court-strips-federal-protections-from-some-wetlands-boosts-property-rights
All Note Details