Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-26 14:57:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B5FEDFBC6EF425C8019D371E1A32340BFD51A4E5B760A335BDB69A799C8002E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court ruled 9-0 for an Idaho couple, but was divided 5-4 on EPA regulatory authority with the minority arguing that the majority had gone too far with its reasoning. The tweet is factually correct and needs no additional context. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-cuts-epas-clean-water-act-protection/story?id=99600775 https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/supreme-court-strips-federal-protections-from-some-wetlands-boosts-property-rights

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661837785538371599
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B5FEDFBC6EF425C8019D371E1A32340BFD51A4E5B760A335BDB69A799C8002E
  • createdAtMillis - 1685113037031
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16618377855383715990B5FEDFBC6EF425C8019D371E1A32340BFD51A4E5B760A335BDB69A799C8002E