Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-25 19:36:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9ECA0300603BD92D9C41903EF262033A05EEF8333D01E8333F2028D81965E85B
Participant Details

Original Note:

All 9 judges agreed that the EPA overstepped its authority and that the plaintiffs' property should not be subject to EPA regulation. However, 4 judges disagreed with the majority's opinion on the limits of EPA authority with respect to wetlands. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/25/us/supreme-court-epa-water-pollution.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661801250894086165
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9ECA0300603BD92D9C41903EF262033A05EEF8333D01E8333F2028D81965E85B
  • createdAtMillis - 1685043393993
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16618012508940861659ECA0300603BD92D9C41903EF262033A05EEF8333D01E8333F2028D81965E85B