Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-25 19:33:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6880B80A98D289A743E6449A122130EA9CBE39171D095E1EB2A8367FA7735244
Participant Details

Original Note:

Poltico says Sackett vs. EPA was a 5-4 decision. It was actually 9-0, with a majority opinion from 5 justices and multiple concurring opinions, all siding with the Sacketts. https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-454.html https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency_(2023)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661798843632025601
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6880B80A98D289A743E6449A122130EA9CBE39171D095E1EB2A8367FA7735244
  • createdAtMillis - 1685043221790
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16617988436320256016880B80A98D289A743E6449A122130EA9CBE39171D095E1EB2A8367FA7735244