Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-25 21:46:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75EA01D4936C91A19B5FA59EC6BA93101F931E68F53197E84806BFF2AB2BD806
Participant Details

Original Note:

The 5-4 tally is correct. Kavanaugh and 3 others only agreed with this specific case, not the majority’s “…new test [that] will leave some long-regulated adjacent wetlands no longer covered by the Clean Water Act, with significant repercussions for water quality…” Source: Ibid

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661779146626805774
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 75EA01D4936C91A19B5FA59EC6BA93101F931E68F53197E84806BFF2AB2BD806
  • createdAtMillis - 1685051195225
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166177914662680577475EA01D4936C91A19B5FA59EC6BA93101F931E68F53197E84806BFF2AB2BD806