Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-25 21:24:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07DDC53ED83F55C73430526DF711BC549A99DEEA6B297CBC0AB17AA782EBEFDB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The 5-4 tally is correct. Kavanaugh and 3 others only agreed with this specific case, not the majority’s “…new test [that] will leave some long-regulated adjacent wetlands no longer covered by the Clean Water Act, with significant repercussions for water quality…” Source: Ibid

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661779146626805774
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07DDC53ED83F55C73430526DF711BC549A99DEEA6B297CBC0AB17AA782EBEFDB
  • createdAtMillis - 1685049852934
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166177914662680577407DDC53ED83F55C73430526DF711BC549A99DEEA6B297CBC0AB17AA782EBEFDB