Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-25 12:47:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C84DDE4139A409677F4CB5E8A361EA65D417CE8C5A22B909553FF55EDA85F648
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Claim is sufficiently vague in language to be defensible (no stated definitions of "parenting", "almost", "impact", or most importantly "turn out"). Tweet is therefore an opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661711209865924611
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C84DDE4139A409677F4CB5E8A361EA65D417CE8C5A22B909553FF55EDA85F648
  • createdAtMillis - 1685018865147
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1661711209865924611C84DDE4139A409677F4CB5E8A361EA65D417CE8C5A22B909553FF55EDA85F648