Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-25 14:49:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8F51F7B0E37F30EC3D460718C25199F0B90AAA7D22CFD915C9BEA952AC8A6B70
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Claim is sufficiently vague in language to be defensible (no stated definitions of "parenting", "almost", "impact", or most importantly "turn out"). Tweet is therefore an opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661711209865924611
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8F51F7B0E37F30EC3D460718C25199F0B90AAA7D22CFD915C9BEA952AC8A6B70
  • createdAtMillis - 1685026184534
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16617112098659246118F51F7B0E37F30EC3D460718C25199F0B90AAA7D22CFD915C9BEA952AC8A6B70