Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-25 11:08:08 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A6EB69DFB7543A857E7D9393223239FC3007E47F6C8B34A2DE5E7BD3AC59734
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is a link to an interview and describes the content of said interview. If you want to continue trying to defame an organization based on a sketchy discredited “source”, do it in the replies instead of hiding in an anonymous community note like a coward. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661676538029391872
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A6EB69DFB7543A857E7D9393223239FC3007E47F6C8B34A2DE5E7BD3AC59734
  • createdAtMillis - 1685012888639
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16616765380293918722A6EB69DFB7543A857E7D9393223239FC3007E47F6C8B34A2DE5E7BD3AC59734