Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-25 11:30:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 11A3ED9B507E1E6AAFF30F3F6DCB4C26FF5D4EE87B16E47DDC89329277152B36
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is a link to an interview and describes the content of said interview. If you want to continue trying to defame an organization based on a sketchy discredited “source”, do it in the replies instead of hiding in an anonymous community note like a coward. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661676538029391872
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 11A3ED9B507E1E6AAFF30F3F6DCB4C26FF5D4EE87B16E47DDC89329277152B36
  • createdAtMillis - 1685014257767
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166167653802939187211A3ED9B507E1E6AAFF30F3F6DCB4C26FF5D4EE87B16E47DDC89329277152B36