Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-25 03:23:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 569AB992250E7F0F508601FD161AF73F8E9FADF35E9D8494A7A40CF7C6CAED2E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet expresses an opinion so no additional notes are needed. Keep discussions in the comments and avoid abusing community notes. As an addendum, there are doctors in the comments questioning the validity of the studies in the note above.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661542505899327491
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 569AB992250E7F0F508601FD161AF73F8E9FADF35E9D8494A7A40CF7C6CAED2E
  • createdAtMillis - 1684984999403
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1661542505899327491569AB992250E7F0F508601FD161AF73F8E9FADF35E9D8494A7A40CF7C6CAED2E