Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-25 02:22:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 345334AE7748E98E1715F09EEF3E29974C8F87A902C13991F29D8921F8549B59
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet expresses an opinion so no additional notes are needed. Keep discussions in the comments and avoid abusing community notes. As an addendum, there are doctors in the comments questioning the validity of the studies in the note above.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661542505899327491
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 345334AE7748E98E1715F09EEF3E29974C8F87A902C13991F29D8921F8549B59
  • createdAtMillis - 1684981340211
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1661542505899327491345334AE7748E98E1715F09EEF3E29974C8F87A902C13991F29D8921F8549B59