Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-25 03:51:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00382E8D72BB005179F7973DE3C9EC53A464B3C17F3CF4D0DC0969026D4CA163
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet expresses an opinion so no additional notes are needed. Keep discussions in the comments and avoid abusing community notes. As an addendum, there are doctors in the comments questioning the validity of the studies in the note above.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661542505899327491
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00382E8D72BB005179F7973DE3C9EC53A464B3C17F3CF4D0DC0969026D4CA163
  • createdAtMillis - 1684986665619
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166154250589932749100382E8D72BB005179F7973DE3C9EC53A464B3C17F3CF4D0DC0969026D4CA163