Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-25 05:07:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2CDF1ED4C4FDB177F6A176724D1A281256C071DF34B115FFEB38C6CBC9C66850
Participant Details

Original Note:

All 4 links in the proposed note lead to the same study of a single patient. One patient being studied is not "well studied." There is nothing factually inaccurate about the original tweet, the proposed note belongs as a comment post, not a community note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661449946472620033
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2CDF1ED4C4FDB177F6A176724D1A281256C071DF34B115FFEB38C6CBC9C66850
  • createdAtMillis - 1684991261213
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16614499464726200332CDF1ED4C4FDB177F6A176724D1A281256C071DF34B115FFEB38C6CBC9C66850