Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-24 19:14:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0AC7CCA6B566F7D4A2DE25766DDFE2D949F8EA560B512EFD1CEEDA8F517A5325
Participant Details

Original Note:

No children were forced to wear any clothing and the items that were criticised were not included in the children’s section. The tuck-friendly clothing was targeted at adults, but misinformation was spread stating it was sold in the kids section, which it was not.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661448645839933459
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0AC7CCA6B566F7D4A2DE25766DDFE2D949F8EA560B512EFD1CEEDA8F517A5325
  • createdAtMillis - 1684955679703
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16614486458399334590AC7CCA6B566F7D4A2DE25766DDFE2D949F8EA560B512EFD1CEEDA8F517A5325