Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-24 04:22:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8CF27D4D910F544E6A96F46A37E708725935CCA205E9E6BFBB3D634B0E1F1DB8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Characterizing lack of bias or censorship as beneficial to one “wing” of debate is fundamentally misleading about the role free speech plays in the founding and continued maintenance of democracies. Studies in fact indicate speech restrictions undermine democratic engagement. https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368691/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661183737642594310
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8CF27D4D910F544E6A96F46A37E708725935CCA205E9E6BFBB3D634B0E1F1DB8
  • createdAtMillis - 1684902129752
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16611837376425943108CF27D4D910F544E6A96F46A37E708725935CCA205E9E6BFBB3D634B0E1F1DB8