Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-24 10:04:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F00FE189002EFA972F957A78FFF0EC09F395E0DB46A4DA81DFC593B5BD3966B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Characterizing lack of bias or censorship as beneficial to one “wing” of debate is fundamentally misleading about the role free speech plays in the founding and continued maintenance of democracies. Studies in fact indicate speech restrictions undermine democratic engagement. https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368691/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661183737642594310
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F00FE189002EFA972F957A78FFF0EC09F395E0DB46A4DA81DFC593B5BD3966B
  • createdAtMillis - 1684922641354
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16611837376425943100F00FE189002EFA972F957A78FFF0EC09F395E0DB46A4DA81DFC593B5BD3966B