Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-24 04:29:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A6DEEA88C24C5E3542F59E1232CBBF7FAD0E082C376583C7D7637CDA3C5DF59
Participant Details

Original Note:

Characterizing lack of bias or censorship as beneficial to one “wing” of debate is fundamentally misleading about the role free speech plays in the founding and continued maintenance of democracies. Studies in fact indicate speech restrictions undermine democratic engagement. https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368691/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661183737642594310
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A6DEEA88C24C5E3542F59E1232CBBF7FAD0E082C376583C7D7637CDA3C5DF59
  • createdAtMillis - 1684902551421
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16611837376425943100A6DEEA88C24C5E3542F59E1232CBBF7FAD0E082C376583C7D7637CDA3C5DF59