Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-24 23:13:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8773AD29A8EEACAEF77E5169D61FDF9219109B6046819B2E67A4D0758F6D2E1E
Participant Details

Original Note:

In the methods section, the invitation to participants does not tell respondents that the results will be published and goes on to state that the responses were not meant for publication. Going on to publish after not disclosing this information violates informed consent. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02576-9

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661147883498864640
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8773AD29A8EEACAEF77E5169D61FDF9219109B6046819B2E67A4D0758F6D2E1E
  • createdAtMillis - 1684970032650
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16611478834988646408773AD29A8EEACAEF77E5169D61FDF9219109B6046819B2E67A4D0758F6D2E1E