Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-24 04:14:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2B16EFD2A391E49876C5E5B666D04A736BB335A065E7BB69E5A548803F977AF1
Participant Details

Original Note:

In the methods section, the invitation to participants does not tell respondents that the results will be published and goes on to state that the responses were not meant for publication. Going on to publish after not disclosing this information violates informed consent. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02576-9

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661147883498864640
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2B16EFD2A391E49876C5E5B666D04A736BB335A065E7BB69E5A548803F977AF1
  • createdAtMillis - 1684901691159
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16611478834988646402B16EFD2A391E49876C5E5B666D04A736BB335A065E7BB69E5A548803F977AF1