Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-17 04:18:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FAD4750EEEDAFE682A0B93C8702E5B17E61F7DA511B26E0234ED5077E1FA68AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Re: other note The cited Tweet does not indicate whether or not participants believed they had agreed to publication. Participants may have understood agreeing to the survey (with disclosure that answers are published) as agreeing to publish. Publisher decided that's not enough.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661145680071606278
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FAD4750EEEDAFE682A0B93C8702E5B17E61F7DA511B26E0234ED5077E1FA68AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1731817128525
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1661145680071606278FAD4750EEEDAFE682A0B93C8702E5B17E61F7DA511B26E0234ED5077E1FA68AB