Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-24 04:54:06 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48A2E607E5BABD81644035E34F1E4D3C59DFE25A842B22EBB447E1FFDC8634E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Re: other note The cited Tweet does not indicate whether or not participants believed they had agreed to publication. Participants may have understood agreeing to the survey (with disclosure that answers are published) as agreeing to publish. Publisher decided that's not enough.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661145680071606278
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48A2E607E5BABD81644035E34F1E4D3C59DFE25A842B22EBB447E1FFDC8634E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1684904046532
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166114568007160627848A2E607E5BABD81644035E34F1E4D3C59DFE25A842B22EBB447E1FFDC8634E9