Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-24 18:17:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 15E0AB6B829A76E0F4A90C7B1A9BE193A07A4CE24CF78BC8485F7A419F10A470
Participant Details

Original Note:

Re: other note The cited Tweet does not indicate whether or not participants believed they had agreed to publication. Participants may have understood agreeing to the survey (with disclosure that answers are published) as agreeing to publish. Publisher decided that's not enough.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661145680071606278
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 15E0AB6B829A76E0F4A90C7B1A9BE193A07A4CE24CF78BC8485F7A419F10A470
  • createdAtMillis - 1684952273699
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166114568007160627815E0AB6B829A76E0F4A90C7B1A9BE193A07A4CE24CF78BC8485F7A419F10A470