Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-05-24 09:06:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E2BBF5BC5C12D6D06EE1D03AEC106E5470B43798247420ED933F32CB17A9E5BD
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Court of Appeal found “the Defendant was responsible for the unlawful publication”. Before appealing, the Defendant must seek permission from the Court of Appeal to appeal to the U.K. Supreme Court or request permission from the higher court directly. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/cadwalladr-to-pay-million-pound-damages/ https://inforrm.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Banks-v-Cadwalladr-CA-order.pdf
All Note Details