Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-05-24 08:27:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: BC7C82C9A4B3DC6A9A9B4EC20B143C43213D12B1A45AEFD010D4F83DD0FB1F67
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Court of Appeal found “the Defendant was responsible for the unlawful publication”. Before appealing, the Defendant must seek permission from the Court of Appeal to appeal to the U.K. Supreme Court or request permission from the higher court directly. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/cadwalladr-to-pay-million-pound-damages/ https://inforrm.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Banks-v-Cadwalladr-CA-order.pdf
All Note Details