Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-05-24 04:22:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 8666CB2EAC2B373A1904F42E369A472DD9AD193A9D2EFD8F7BC006039AAF206E
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Court of Appeal found “the Defendant was responsible for the unlawful publication”. Before appealing, the Defendant must seek permission from the Court of Appeal to appeal to the U.K. Supreme Court or request permission from the higher court directly. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/cadwalladr-to-pay-million-pound-damages/ https://inforrm.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Banks-v-Cadwalladr-CA-order.pdf
All Note Details