Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-19 18:14:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F46CE6BBEB39E4B1CEC954A8AEEDA9E8D5CA2FF12AC412352072D3C39A8E93C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Even if the science could be "settled", this systemic review discredits this view. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11930-023-00358-x

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661020604043264000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F46CE6BBEB39E4B1CEC954A8AEEDA9E8D5CA2FF12AC412352072D3C39A8E93C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1700417642789
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1661020604043264000F46CE6BBEB39E4B1CEC954A8AEEDA9E8D5CA2FF12AC412352072D3C39A8E93C1