Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-31 02:48:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E54E3D916C2B183ED90861A7B6D0810E87D629744EBAD71010EB85BA86FA1049
Participant Details

Original Note:

Even if the science could be "settled", this systemic review discredits this view. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11930-023-00358-x

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661020604043264000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E54E3D916C2B183ED90861A7B6D0810E87D629744EBAD71010EB85BA86FA1049
  • createdAtMillis - 1690771688545
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1661020604043264000E54E3D916C2B183ED90861A7B6D0810E87D629744EBAD71010EB85BA86FA1049