Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-23 11:15:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CFFF6B01B9EE72C7943902994BC45C8DA461CF73BACAFE165A32AB4049631486
Participant Details

Original Note:

This may not be relevant or applicable. The “Figure 5” is dated 2005, and the journal article is from 2010. The premise and methodology may be faulty as well.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1660943406296895489
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CFFF6B01B9EE72C7943902994BC45C8DA461CF73BACAFE165A32AB4049631486
  • createdAtMillis - 1684840507584
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1660943406296895489CFFF6B01B9EE72C7943902994BC45C8DA461CF73BACAFE165A32AB4049631486