Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-23 12:20:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1F09FEBFC2E696A2F43A27B42876904AE3DBA9F42168C467BDE4626F31E0F24
Participant Details

Original Note:

This may not be relevant or applicable. The “Figure 5” is dated 2005, and the journal article is from 2010. The premise and methodology may be faulty as well.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1660943406296895489
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1F09FEBFC2E696A2F43A27B42876904AE3DBA9F42168C467BDE4626F31E0F24
  • createdAtMillis - 1684844452982
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1660943406296895489C1F09FEBFC2E696A2F43A27B42876904AE3DBA9F42168C467BDE4626F31E0F24