Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-23 12:18:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36069A133909A8C0412FF4DD088A6FEC36E47C75A2D16C5ABF0B30D42BE3FFDD
Participant Details

Original Note:

This may not be relevant or applicable. The “Figure 5” is dated 2005, and the journal article is from 2010. The premise and methodology may be faulty as well.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1660943406296895489
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36069A133909A8C0412FF4DD088A6FEC36E47C75A2D16C5ABF0B30D42BE3FFDD
  • createdAtMillis - 1684844321053
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166094340629689548936069A133909A8C0412FF4DD088A6FEC36E47C75A2D16C5ABF0B30D42BE3FFDD