Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-23 09:53:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17F8CC8BDDC74B576C685B3AE3E7F16A8AC05816D4F8E24C804E26B84418C2DC
Participant Details

Original Note:

This may not be relevant or applicable. The “Figure 5” is dated 2005, and the journal article is from 2010. The premise and methodology may be faulty as well.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1660943406296895489
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 17F8CC8BDDC74B576C685B3AE3E7F16A8AC05816D4F8E24C804E26B84418C2DC
  • createdAtMillis - 1684835606444
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166094340629689548917F8CC8BDDC74B576C685B3AE3E7F16A8AC05816D4F8E24C804E26B84418C2DC