Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-23 13:44:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 12440F70709BC2ACDAFB6BDF47C3E1EC36A05E3D2C57F3259D2B065184F992CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

This may not be relevant or applicable. The “Figure 5” is dated 2005, and the journal article is from 2010. The premise and methodology may be faulty as well.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1660943406296895489
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 12440F70709BC2ACDAFB6BDF47C3E1EC36A05E3D2C57F3259D2B065184F992CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1684849486709
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166094340629689548912440F70709BC2ACDAFB6BDF47C3E1EC36A05E3D2C57F3259D2B065184F992CE