Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-22 09:16:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFA1D69F3B81BAE434F97B262BF416D299285121C7C5EE3EA7E03CEC450A6F5B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet accurately summarizes the cited paper. The link to the paper also contains critiques of the paper and replies from the authors as well as the editor's reasons for publishing the paper. It's all there. No context needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1660521759362408448
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFA1D69F3B81BAE434F97B262BF416D299285121C7C5EE3EA7E03CEC450A6F5B
  • createdAtMillis - 1684747011454
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1660521759362408448EFA1D69F3B81BAE434F97B262BF416D299285121C7C5EE3EA7E03CEC450A6F5B