Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-22 12:42:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BD156647148E1BD56C769B360450874B0149FD00E38CF99F08A5D31587C4CE02
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet accurately summarizes the cited paper. The link to the paper also contains critiques of the paper and replies from the authors as well as the editor's reasons for publishing the paper. It's all there. No context needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1660521759362408448
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BD156647148E1BD56C769B360450874B0149FD00E38CF99F08A5D31587C4CE02
  • createdAtMillis - 1684759328951
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1660521759362408448BD156647148E1BD56C769B360450874B0149FD00E38CF99F08A5D31587C4CE02