Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-22 10:15:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E5743C652F3801F461FE559BEEE741F7F016098F206E963AA11A47F6BFE437F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet accurately summarizes the cited paper. The link to the paper also contains critiques of the paper and replies from the authors as well as the editor's reasons for publishing the paper. It's all there. No context needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1660521759362408448
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E5743C652F3801F461FE559BEEE741F7F016098F206E963AA11A47F6BFE437F
  • createdAtMillis - 1684750511495
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16605217593624084484E5743C652F3801F461FE559BEEE741F7F016098F206E963AA11A47F6BFE437F