Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-22 02:58:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3D14BA6E712278F0E123C50EA04B2156317EBA6DB969F0A47CD880A7B655015
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading tweet. Citation needed. The Reuters article that was quote tweeted neither mentioned the amount of water needed to clean the fountain, or whether it was actually necessary to do so.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1660478384793690113
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C3D14BA6E712278F0E123C50EA04B2156317EBA6DB969F0A47CD880A7B655015
  • createdAtMillis - 1684724298190
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1660478384793690113C3D14BA6E712278F0E123C50EA04B2156317EBA6DB969F0A47CD880A7B655015